The Most Astonishing Anthropological Fact That I Know

At one point about 7,000 years ago, and for a period of about 2,000 years thereafter, the percentage of human males having offspring was reduced to 1 in 20 in Europe, Asia, and Africa, while female reproducers remained at previous levels. Wow. Take a moment, please, to think about how totally weird that is.

In other words, quite suddenly, only 1 in 20 males was having children. If you were a male, your chances of getting laid and having a child were pretty small–about 5 percent. This is known as the Neolithic Y-chromosome bottleneck and was occurring at the same time as the emergence of settled agricultural communities.

It seems that strongmen, alpha males, at the heads of settled agricultural groups eliminated their competition for females almost entirely, probably via truly breathtakingly brutal wars a) on foragers and wandering herders and b) between different patrilineal groups–killing off almost all other males or enslaving them and preventing them from reproducing. You might refer to this as the “Gang Wars” period of our prehistory. It is very likely that this astonishing cultural revolution among our ancestors gave rise to the intensely patriarchal and hierarchical city state that replaced the previous human foraging bands–the city state built around an oracular central monument–a temple mountain, from which the god/king ruled. This was strongman behavior with a vengeance.

And, ofc, both patriarchal monotheism and the notion of the ruler as god or as the god’s representative on Earth suited these people quite well. (It’s astonishing to me that millions of Americans don’t know that monotheism was a relatively late human invention. Instruction in history, in our schools, is pretty bad, but instruction in prehistory, in our K-12 schools, is almost nonexistent.)

However, within settled agricultural communities, numbers of males surviving to reproduce then started to grow again. Why? Well, population explosion in such communities was made possible by abundant (though not very healthy) grain, which produced more warriors and made those communities more powerful, and as those communities grew, they made increasing use of divisions of labor and of an underclass–with different people taking on different roles, as rulers, administrators, priests, builders, farmers, warriors, child-care workers, and so on, and many of these were not primary producers of food and had to be supported. It paid to have division of labor and a large subservient class–more men both to do labor and to sire more subservient laborers. In its full flowering, the Neolithic agricultural city state was intensely hierarchical (there was a huge underclass to support all those warriors, administrators, priests, and rulers) and patriarchal (for the most part–early states like Çatalhöyük may have been matriarchal.)

So, the adulation of the strongman that one saw and sees in, say, John Gotti, Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump, and people of that ilk has a long and ugly history–it emerged with what we call “civilization.” Trump is a wannabe strongman. He claims that the Constitution gives him the power “to do anything I want.” Ofc, he’s totally loony and turns into a sniveling lackey around the actual strongmen around the world whom he so wants to be like when he grows up.

The danger of reversion to fascism–to rule by strongman–is always there, folks, and preventing it requires education and constant vigilance.

Advertisement

About Bob Shepherd

interests: curriculum design, educational technology, learning, linguistics, hermeneutics, rhetoric, philosophy (Continental philosophy, Existentialism, metaphysics, philosophy of language, philosophy of mind, epistemology, ethics), classical and jazz guitar, poetry, the short story, archaeology and cultural anthropology, history of religion, prehistory, veganism, sustainability, Anglo-Saxon literature and language, systems for emergent quality control, heuristics for innovation
This entry was posted in Sex and Gender, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to The Most Astonishing Anthropological Fact That I Know

  1. Abby says:

    Interesting…it seems that the patrilineal custom of women tending to leave the clan to join their mates’ clan left the y chromosome gene pool very limited within each clan. Skirmishes that wiped out entire clans would have greatly reduced y-chromosome variance.
    I also believe that a similar human female bottleneck very likely occurred much earlier, probably during the transition to bipedalism, which resulted in the “hemochorial” placenta, making pregnancy so much more dangerous for humans than for other species.
    https://www.sciencealert.com/neolithic-y-chromosome-bottleneck-warring-patrilineal-clans

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2016/05/06/how-and-why-did-women-evolve-periods/#7f579eb557a3

    Liked by 2 people

  2. gitapik says:

    Ahhh, the good ol’ days.

    This is excellent, Bob. Vital info that I had no knowledge of. Will share.

    Oh…and regarding Trump:

    I saw an interview where he said, “I’m tough. Noone’s tougher than me.”

    Street 101, Donnie Boy: if you’re telling everyone about it, then you ain’t gittin’ it. And the tough guys don’t need to tell anyone about it.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Bob Shepherd says:

      All these mobsters style themselves as tough guys.

      Like

      • manicmikey says:

        Ha! Ravitch wrote to me via email, says I’m not blocked, I’m “in moderation”. Wow…libs/dems/progressives, the real fascists, simply must be in control of others. Just like this gas stove nonsense…libs think they’re gonna save the planet by forcing you to cook on electric stoves…republicans/conservatives could not give a rat’s ass what kind of stove you use. You know — that silly freedom of choice thing we used to care about.

        Like

  3. manicmikey says:

    Hey Bob I knew I was getting to Ravitch by responding to her emails directly…she finally put my latest comment on her drag queen blog but still has me blocked from responding. What is with libs and their inability to engage in debate? I don’t threaten, curse, or dox…I just SAY things they can’t handle. The christians on Gab are getting ready to burn me at the stake, because they can’t handle it when I ridicule their “faith”. One guy blocked me after I quoted some Billy Joel lyrics to him! Anyway, please try to persuade Ravitch to unblock me, in the spirit of “free speech”…all I said in my latest attempt was that drag queens are a weird obsession…would you be OK with biological females wearing pasties and thongs, or completely nude, reading to or performing their act in front of kids? Also, casinos and bars block minors/kids from entry…just what IS it with this drag queen stuff? Again, I LOVE drag queens and all sorts of weird sexual stuff —- FOR ADULTS ONLY!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s