An omniscient, third-person point of view typically (but not always) assumes a Godlike understanding of how things are, and readers go along with this . . . until they don’t–until the POV of the little man behind the curtain becomes all too abundantly clear because it is emphatically not that of the reader. This POV is almost always loaded with question-begging of a particularly insidious kind–the sort that assumes a POV for all, including the reader, as though it were a completely objective “view from nowhere” (as philosopher Thomas Nagel calls this). All people have lots and lots of unexamined assumptions–more than they do examined ones, which is a basic fact about learning–that it is not only mostly inductive but also mostly unconscious acquisition, not consciously acquired and examined. And the insidious part of the 3P OM POV is that, because people acquire beliefs mostly in this way, a skillful author can sneak in a lot of stuff under the radar, without the reader even being aware of it.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Bob Shepherd on Kant: Finding a Way In Bob Shepherd on Kant: Finding a Way In Jon Awbrey on Kant: Finding a Way In Bob Shepherd on The Future Fascists Fashi… Mike Pulcifer on The Future Fascists Fashi… Archives
- March 2023
- February 2023
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- October 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- November 2018
- October 2017
- September 2017
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
Categories
Meta
- Follow Bob Shepherd | Praxis on WordPress.com