Gayle Greene on How to Build a Human

How do you build a world-class human? Well, you give him or her the benefits of a broad, humane liberal arts education that confers judgment, wisdom, vision, and generosity. In her new book, Immeasurable Outcomes: Teaching Shakespeare in the Age of the Algorithm, Gayle Greene, a renowned Shakespeare scholar and Professor Emerita at Scripps University, shows us, with examples from her classes over three decades, exactly how that is done. And she doesn’t do this at some high level of abstraction. Rather, she backs up her profound general observations with concrete, vivid, fascinating, moving, funny, honest, delightful examples from her classes. 

She also shows us how, under the “standards”-and-testing occupation of our schools, that development of well-rounded, liberally educated young people is being lost.

This engaging book is a full-throated defense of the Liberal Arts and of traditional, humane, in-person, discussion-based education in a time when Liberal Arts schools and programs are being more than decimated, are being damned-near destroyed by bean counters and champions of ed tech. Here’s the beauty and value of the book: contra the “Reformers,” Greene details the extraordinary benefits of the broad, liberal educations that built in the United States the people who created the most powerful, vibrant, and diverse economy in history. She makes the case (I know. It’s bizarre that one would have to) for not taking a wrecking ball to what has worked. 

Some background: Like much of Europe between 1939 and 1945, education in the United States, at every level, is now under occupation. The occupation is led by Bill Gates and the Gates Foundation and abetted by countless collaborators like those paid by Gates to create the puerile and failed Common Core (which was not core—that is, central, key, or foundational—and was common only in the sense of being vulgar). The bean counting under the occupation via its demonstrably invalid, pseudoscientific testing regime has made of schooling in the U.S. a diminished thing, with debased and devolved test preppy curricula (teaching materials) and pedagogy (teaching methods).

In the midst of this, Greene engages in some delightful bomb throwing for the Resistance.

OK.  Let’s try another metaphor. If Gates’s test-and-punish movement, ludicrously called “Education Reform,” is a metastasizing cancer on our educational system, and it is, then Professor Greene’s book is a prescription for how to reverse course and then practice prevention to end the stultification of education and keep it from coming back. 

Years ago, I knew a fellow who retired after a lucrative, successful career. But a couple months later, he was back at his old job. I asked him why he had decided not simply to enjoy his retirement. He certainly had the money to do so.

“Well, Bob,” he said, “there’s only so much playing solitaire one can do.”

I found this answer depressing. I wondered if it were the case that over the years, the fellow had given so much time to work that when he no longer had that to occupy him, he was bored to tears. Had he not built up the internal resources he needed to keep himself happy and engaged ON HIS OWN? Greene quotes, in her book, Judith Shapiro, former president of Barnard College, saying, “You want the inside of your head to be an interesting place to spend the rest of your life.” The French novelist Honoré de Balzac put it this way: “The cultured man is never bored.” Humane learning leads to engagement with ideas and with the world, and as Happiness Studies have shown repeatedly, outward-directed engagement, as opposed to self-obsession, leads to fulfillment, to flourishing over a lifetime, to what the ancient Greeks called eudaimonia, or wellness of spirit. Kinda important, that.

In a time when Gates and his minions, including his impressive collection of political and bureaucratic action figures and bobble-head dolls, are arguing that colleges should become worker factories and do away with programs and requirements not directly related to particular jobs, it turns out that the people happiest in their jobs are ones with well-rounded liberal arts educations, and these are the ones who are best at what they do. And it turns out that people taught how to read and think and communicate and be creative and flexible, people who gain a broad base of knowledge of sciences, history, mathematics, arts, literature, and philosophy, are self-directed learners who can figure out what they need to know in a particular situation and acquire that knowledge. Philosophy students turn out to be great lawyers, doctors, politicians, and political operatives. Traditional liberal arts instruction creates intrinsically motivated people—just the sort of people that employers in their right minds want and certainly the sort that most employers need.

All this and more about the value of liberal arts education Professor Greene makes abundantly clear, and she does so in prose that is sometimes witty, sometimes hilarious, sometimes annoyed, sometimes incredulous (as in, “I can’t believe I even have to protest this shit”); always engaging, human and humane, compassionate, wise, authentic/real; and often profound. As much memoir as polemic, the book is a delight to read in addition to being important politically and culturally.

Gates and his ilk, little men with big money to throw around, look at the liberal arts and don’t see any immediate application to, say, writing code in Python or figuring out how many pallets per hour a warehouse can move. What could possibly be the value of reading Gilgamesh and Lear? Well, what one encounters in these is the familiar in the unfamiliar. All real learning is unlearning. You have to step through the wardrobe or fall down the rabbit hole or pass through the portal in the space/time continuum to a place beyond your interpellations, beyond the collective fantasies that go by the name of common sense. Real learning requires a period of estrangement from the familiar. You return to find the ordinary transmuted and wondrous and replete with possibility. You become a flexible, creative thinker. You see the world anew, as on the first day of creation, as though for the first time. Vietnam Veterans would often say, “You wouldn’t know because you weren’t there, man.” Well, people who haven’t had those experiences via liberal arts educations don’t know this because they haven’t been there, man.

Gayle Greene has spent a lifetime, Maria Sabina-like, guiding young people through such experiences. Her classroom trip reports alone are worth your time and the modest price of this book. At one point, Professor Greene rifs on the meaning of the word bounty. This is a book by a bounteous mind/spirit about the bountifulness of her beloved liberal arts. Go ahead. Buy it. Treat yourself.

Copyright 2024, Robert D. Shepherd. All rights reserved. This review may be copied and distributed freely as long as this notice is included.

For more by Bob Shepherd about teaching literature and writing, go here: https://bobshepherdonline.wordpress.com/category/teaching-literature-and-writing/

For short stories by Bob Shepherd, go here: https://bobshepherdonline.wordpress.com/category/short-stories/

For poetry by Bob Shepherd and essays on poetry, go here: https://bobshepherdonline.wordpress.com/category/poetry/.

About Bob Shepherd

interests: curriculum design, educational technology, learning, linguistics, hermeneutics, rhetoric, philosophy (Continental philosophy, Existentialism, metaphysics, philosophy of language, philosophy of mind, epistemology, ethics), classical and jazz guitar, poetry, the short story, archaeology and cultural anthropology, history of religion, prehistory, veganism, sustainability, Anglo-Saxon literature and language, systems for emergent quality control, heuristics for innovation
This entry was posted in Teaching Literature and Writing. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to Gayle Greene on How to Build a Human

  1. manicmikey says:

    Note too that a faithful study of the liberal arts humanizes character and permits it not to be cruel. — Publius Ovidius Naso

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Love Greene. Don’t love your sarcastic, dismissive comments about CC. It was the widest-reach in decades to practitioners, not just Gates. It was initially developed bottom-up combined with necessary adjustments in order to serve kids’ opportunities and outcomes (more writing, more STEM, higher standards) and shined in terms of: -tests that match standards, -a massive expansion of writing across curriculum, -equity across state lines, -emphasis on critical thinking. No… not perfect, but much of the imperfections came from the poor welcome it got from states that rejected it. Comment from a teacher, Ed-tech researcher, administrator, liberal arts major and writer.

    Like

  3. Steve Ruis says:

    Re “Well, Bob,” he said, “there’s only so much playing solitaire one can do.”

    The best advice I got prior to my retirement from my college teaching position and which I pass on as often as I can was that “Before you retire, you need to know what you will do after.” In my case after being a professor of chemistry I became a writer and editor of archery books for archery coaches and archery magazines. And seventeen years after retiring from my teaching job I am still at it.

    Like

Leave a comment